>>18322980>Which you can't seem to prove, other than your personal feelingsIt's anecdotal. I'm not trying to prove it, lmao.
>>>>Fags are an everyone problem>>>Stop acting like one>>You are>Lmao more no uBut really. Anyone who has interacted with them has experienced this.
>>I agree that it was a title, lol.>Yup. Which others had.And no one else with the title is documented as being executed in Palestine under the reign of Tiberius
>>>>and there are no better candidates>>>There aren't any>>Yes, I know, which is why your argument is fucking retarded.>You're welcome to your opinionWhich everyone with a brain who reads this thread will agree with
>Not really. Absence of evidence isn't evidence of the absentThat is your contention.
>Tacitus mentions Christ being executed under Tiberius>There are multiple sources attesting to a man named Yesuhua (latinized as Jesu) being referred to as Christ>Those sources say he was executed under Tiberius>You are assuming that the guy that tacitus is talking about must be someone else, without evidenceAll the evidence available points to Christus in tacitus being jesu
>>>Never said he was. That was your strawman>>You told me to refer to the list>Yup.Which gives no evidence that it could be anyone else
>>>Jesus wasn't his name either>>Yes, it was>It was Yeshua. Weird how these historians don't know that eitherIt's latinized as Jesu, and that was germanicized as jesus. It's the same name. That's like saying carl and Charles are not the same name. They are.
>>It comes up in the epistles, written in the 1st century>>written in the 1st century>>1st century>By unknown and speculated authorsJust like most works from the first century. Btw, there is consensus that Paul wrote most of them (they are almost all signed, btw)
>Anyways we're going in circles here bud. Believe what you like but I see no reason toThen quit trying to debunk it, lmao. Go do something else, because you aren't good at this
