>>18369114You don't understand logic.
It is tautological that a thing must meet it's definition.
DEFINITION: No Catholic is Marxist
DEFINITION: No Catholic is pagan, or would defile an alter with a pagan idol
So, you then see Begoglio kissing the feet of pagans, putting pagan idols on the alter of Saint Peter, or claiming that the godless can go to heaven, I'm saying he doesn't meet the definition of Catholic.
DEFINITION: The Pope is Catholic.
Ergo, he doesn't meet the definition of Pope, and is not the Pope.
Your "No True Scottsman fallacy" is not applicable, because Scotsmen are not defined as those who don't put sugar on his porridge.
tl:dr You're ignorant and irrational and thus, you gibber.
