[144 / 28 / 65]
Quoted By: >>18378897 >>18378901 >>18378903 >>18378905 >>18378906 >>18378908 >>18378909 >>18378911 >>18378913 >>18378914 >>18378915 >>18378916 >>18378918 >>18378919 >>18378921 >>18378932 >>18378934 >>18378935 >>18378936 >>18378939 >>18378947 >>18378949 >>18378951 >>18378959 >>18378970 >>18378971 >>18378974 >>18378977 >>18378986 >>18378994 >>18379012 >>18379016 >>18379022 >>18379031 >>18379033 >>18379034 >>18379092 >>18379695
Has anyone had any success on the Wikipedia front of political discourse?
I literally spent hours debating other editors on why the verbiage for this article should read "unproven" instead of "false" just to get permabanned.
How the hell can they can they pass this off as unbiased?
I literally spent hours debating other editors on why the verbiage for this article should read "unproven" instead of "false" just to get permabanned.
How the hell can they can they pass this off as unbiased?
