>>18622248Don't take this the wrong way, but you don't have the intelligence to claim to others what they should accept as right or wrong.
None of your responses are based on critical reasoning, and you have made no efforts to explain what you understand to to be diversity's effect on anime (whether positive or negative, as well as any risks, and potential unintended consequences).
You have shared nothing for others to test their understanding of diversity's effect on anime, and others can't share anything for you to test your own understanding of diversity's effect on anime.
You claim that your value judgement should be accepted by others as if it is absolute truth that applies to everyone.
This most likely stems from your inability to understand that it is practically impossible for others to share perfectly identical set of values as yours, which means it is impossible for you to acknowledge the possibility that others' may actually reach a different value judgement despite how similiar their set of values to yours.
Ultimately, your own value judgement is applicable to you and you only, what you believe about reality doesn't actually make it true, nor can your belief actually affect reality for everyone else.
You can claim diversity to be anime's strength all you want, but it won't make it true, can you understand that?
If you want others to understand why you consider diversity to be anime's strength, you should lay out your reason, knowing that your reasoning will be put to test, but without doing this, you give no reason for others to want to consider your position even a little bit.
There is nothing particularly wrong with lacking a certain ability (to critically reason for instance), but you can claim some redemption for what you lack with an honest admission.
In this case, you can do so by saying that you like to BELIEVE diversity to be anime's strength, and you don't give a fuck what anyone thinks, or rationality of assuming such position.
