>>18690399How am I a simp? Because I blame the consumer for demanding whores instead of blaming the marketplace for providing what the consumer wants?
Using your logic we would blame the coca farmers for providing a product Americans demand. You would argue that if the coca farmers disappeared so would the drug addicts. History of the War on Drugs shows us this logic is 110% incorrect. It is always the demand side of the equation that makes things happen, never the supply side. In absences of demand supply switches to a different product....simple as.
>>18690405Most art is looked a that way now, but you are arguing something I am not, the death of art. I am simply saying no one was interested in her music so she gave the market what it wants, titties. Simple as. I paint and write so get me I understand that no one cares about art of any kind these days.
>>18690407True, I just want to make the true statement that men ask for titties, she provides, men complain. If men didn't act like sex addict beasts 24/7 maybe women wouldn't be such whores. Food for thought.
>>18690412While you make some fair points that she always planned to whore out but it's not simping, it's basic economics and basic logic.
You claim men simple follow their nature, to seek titties yet fault women for doing the same thing...following their nature....to provide titties.
You see you've all explained the double standard very well. The man and the woman are both at fault but the man is more at fault because he is the "adult in the room". Women are overgrown children ruled by emotions and thus have less responsibility for such things.
You are either a man or a sex addict beast, make your choice.
