>>18834851I'm almost certain that both Aphantasia and hyperphantasia aren't real and it's just a bunch of retards not understanding how their "mind's eye" work.
When you're visualizing something, you're not launching Blender in your brain or have it paint a cerebral jpg, you're most likely associating concepts with your visual library and your brain is making shit up on the go to give the illusion of a coherent image.
That's what lead people to believe "They can't see the apple" or that they can see something "In photorealistic details", they're misinterpreting their own thought.
>"Huh nuh, i really can see everything in details"Picture a boat, then get someone to ask you a lot of question up to it's smallest details, from the color of the boat, to the number of bolts securing one of the mast, and have them write your answer down, and ask them again after a few questions, you'll just give different answers, because you're coming up with details rather than truly seeing an object.
>"Aphantasia is a real medical conditions!"It's barely studied, all you have are small studies about people "self reporting aphantasia", it's just another imaginary condition autodiagnosised by people online.
Some people have naturally poor rythm, if one were to misunderstand what is rythm and told online that "Rythmaplegy" is a real condition that makes you unique and special, you'd get the same shit.
