[122 / 28 / 43]
Quoted By: >>19229799 >>19229800 >>19229801 >>19229803 >>19229807 >>19229811 >>19229812 >>19229813 >>19229814 >>19229820 >>19229823 >>19229826 >>19229829 >>19229830 >>19229831 >>19229835 >>19229836 >>19229837 >>19229842 >>19229845 >>19229847 >>19229873 >>19229874 >>19229876 >>19229879 >>19229887 >>19229892 >>19229903 >>19229905 >>19229912
The mere act of comprehending this sentence logically proves the existence of God. Atheists and agnosticucks have absolutely no reply to this air-tight, rational, a priori proof of the existence of God.
For the room-temperature-IQ brainlets (who will never enter the Kingdom of Heaven), here is the deductive logic that follows from that statement:
>Premise: It is a conceptual truth (or, so to speak, true by definition) that God is a being than which none greater can be imagined (that is, the greatest possible being that can be imagined).
>Premise: God exists as an idea in the mind.
>Premise: A being that exists as an idea in the mind and in reality is, other things being equal, greater than a being that exists only as an idea in the mind.
>Premise: Thus, if God exists only as an idea in the mind, then we can imagine something that is greater than God (that is, a greatest possible being that does exist).
>Premise: But we cannot imagine something that is greater than God (for it is a contradiction to suppose that we can imagine a being greater than the greatest possible being that can be imagined.)
>Indisputable conclusion: Therefore, God exists.
What are the political implications of Atheists, and agnostics being completely wrong about the ontological status of God?
For the room-temperature-IQ brainlets (who will never enter the Kingdom of Heaven), here is the deductive logic that follows from that statement:
>Premise: It is a conceptual truth (or, so to speak, true by definition) that God is a being than which none greater can be imagined (that is, the greatest possible being that can be imagined).
>Premise: God exists as an idea in the mind.
>Premise: A being that exists as an idea in the mind and in reality is, other things being equal, greater than a being that exists only as an idea in the mind.
>Premise: Thus, if God exists only as an idea in the mind, then we can imagine something that is greater than God (that is, a greatest possible being that does exist).
>Premise: But we cannot imagine something that is greater than God (for it is a contradiction to suppose that we can imagine a being greater than the greatest possible being that can be imagined.)
>Indisputable conclusion: Therefore, God exists.
What are the political implications of Atheists, and agnostics being completely wrong about the ontological status of God?
