>>19256760Coitus releases 4 times as much testosterone and hgh as jacking off.
Men who have sex during puberty thus end up stronger, taller and smarter than men who don't.
From an abstract biochemical standpoint this is obvious: programming men to become chads is much more energy efficient that giving women 1000-2000 more genes to somehow predict which little boy will become chad.
Women are their own worse enemies: if they partnered with their childhood friends at a young age, all of them would be in happy marriages and their husbands would be 2.3 inches taller, 11 iq points smarter compared to baseline and have 15.2 lbs more muscle mass than average.
Women can't be trusted to do this effectively so their relationships must be arranged.
>How did we fuck up this badly1. We assumed women selected based on some innate ascendency within the human race. This is hubris. Women select based on maximizing entropy. Making 90% of men weaker, sending them to lose wars, and then getting destroyed is much more entropically favorable than curated high civilization.
2. Women are incapable of abstract causality. They are post hoc thinkers about almost everything. They think "Chad is tall and strong. Chad has lots of sex. Therefore chad has more sex because he is tall and strong". It is actually the complete opposite: chad is tall and strong because he got sex at a young age.
So, soon to be extinct western whores: whenever you wonder why you have no driven, tall streetwise hercules as a husband at 30, look in the mirror. You betrayed the boys of your childhood, you all chased after a few dipshits to fuck, and now you're just fucked completely on the interpersonal and societal level. You ruined your men; most of them are depressed, short and fat, incapable of winning any wars.
You will be conquered, subjugated and treated as cattle. The best you can hope for is you and your children being rapeslaves. At worst you will face torture designed to humiliate and then killed.