>>19402567>Because I point out the "I'm just another anon here to help" routine better than most.Okay but what about when I am an anon here to actually help? Are you seriously this disconnected and paranoid?
>>it isn't the jewsThat's not even what I said. Again, the best offense you have is really just a fake good faith participation routine?
>No, it wasn't about "jews", because basically all of the people online obsessing over "jews" have learned nothing about them and still pretend they're the pinnacle of "Deep State" or "TPTB" or whatever terms you want to use.Again, this just feels like a routine to slide and get people to avoid conversing about more valuable topics that people aren't quite as vague about, like you're being. You've obviously not studied much about these subjects. Search the archives like I've said and you'll find I'm very well read about these topics.
>This post answered none of the charges and was just adhomOh so you're now stooping to "you're adhoming me!" even though you're the first one that casted adhom like a woman? Again, you seem super hypocritical.
>you're using a fall back position!What?
>>19402569I just said I can explain why "Judeans were not 'jewish'". I didn't say I would explain why "jews are not the head of the snake".
You're awfully careful to set things up in ways that don't actually represent my communications, like a strawman... which happens to be on that list of forum sliding techniques you linked to here
>>19402561Anon, you're very exhausting. Why should I continue to entertain you?
We have rules against giving much attention to tripfags for this exact reason. You have a hugely inflated ego, you can't seem to get a firm grasp on who is rhetorically or philosophically on your side and arguments you participate in seem to all too often devolve into circlejerks like this, where people try to one up each other on agreeing that "jews" are way more competent and genuine than they actually are.
