[315 / 76 / 87]
Quoted By: >>19454380 >>19454383 >>19454386 >>19454387 >>19454388 >>19454389 >>19454392 >>19454394 >>19454396 >>19454398 >>19454400 >>19454404 >>19454406 >>19454419 >>19454426 >>19454428 >>19454431 >>19454439 >>19454444 >>19454450 >>19454458 >>19454464 >>19454466 >>19454473 >>19454500 >>19454501 >>19454518 >>19454548 >>19454563 >>19454589 >>19454591 >>19454634 >>19454646 >>19454648 >>19454663 >>19454669 >>19454675 >>19454679 >>19454681 >>19454683 >>19455192
Prove the moon exists such that it overcomes atheist levels of doubt and scrutiny. Here are the rules:
>eyewitness testimony is rejected out of hand (actual argument atheists use to dismiss Christian accounts of Christ from antiquity)
>just because you see it doesn't mean you aren't just lying or hallucinating it (actual argument atheists use to dismiss personal experiences of the divine in the present)
>to use a photo, object, etc, or other such physicality as evidence, you need to prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that it's not a forgery (actual argument atheists use to attack the shroud of turin and things like that)
>writing it down in your journal doesn't make it real (actual argument atheists use to dismiss scripture)
>if the evidence you offer isn't absolute and it's possible what you think is the moon is actually something else or nothing at all, there is "no evidence" for the moon's existence
>eyewitness testimony is rejected out of hand (actual argument atheists use to dismiss Christian accounts of Christ from antiquity)
>just because you see it doesn't mean you aren't just lying or hallucinating it (actual argument atheists use to dismiss personal experiences of the divine in the present)
>to use a photo, object, etc, or other such physicality as evidence, you need to prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that it's not a forgery (actual argument atheists use to attack the shroud of turin and things like that)
>writing it down in your journal doesn't make it real (actual argument atheists use to dismiss scripture)
>if the evidence you offer isn't absolute and it's possible what you think is the moon is actually something else or nothing at all, there is "no evidence" for the moon's existence
