>>19457883Unfortunately the internet and the web aren't the same. In the years since that picture was doing the rounds the web has become more centralised and commericialised.
The problem is that there are generations that are coming up now that have grown up on "apps" in walled gardens (like the app store or google play). They can't even discover the old internet easy because the pozzed browser and search engines won't make it easy for them to find it, they want to steer them to commerical shit like instagram, tinder, etc.
I've noticed in the past 10 years it's become increasingly difficult to find stuff that once was easy to find. Sites are expected to die. But if there are no new sites to replace them and only corporate bullshit (the kind that is happy to censor to keep advertisers or Jewish lobby groups happy) means that censorship on the web is going to be a very real thing and it will return to the legacy media (where they can decide what to cover, who to talk to and promote, etc and the undesirable views and people will be invisible to the average person).
The best thing the average person can do is do what you did with the picture, you hoard stuff on hard disks. Likewise, as many people as possible should be doing the same with these open models. Storage space is really cheap.
I believe in the internet, it was after all designed to withstand nuclear war. But the web and what's happened to it has meant that we may need to ditch https. Other protocols like bittorrent or bitcoin are more kike proof in reaction to what kikes were doing. There should be a replacement for http that is the same.