>>19460171>what was SatanicThe whole premise is stupid, anon. Firstly, "Satanism" is a pretty recent (Jesuit) invention. First they bifurcated Divinity, contrasting Eastern systems where deities aren't always lovey-dovey and wearing kid gloves, but actually put you in your place if you're being a huge douche. Next, they made you detest the "mean side" of Divinity and then made you antagonize it, calling it "Adversary". The harshness of the Divine response to your life choices isn't a measure of "evil", but balance. When you're out of balance, a correction is issued. That's the "negative" side of Divinity in a nutshell. Your apathetic reductions are gross misunderstandings at best and nefarious compliance at worst. I think you're probably just simple, but just know that people long before you confused everyone on purpose.
>sacrificing animals/people to Ba'elBa'el, Iupiter, Jove, Zeus, all of these guys were popular gods (the same guy) to sacrifice to because they supposedly in very ancient times "kept the floods or other cataclysms from returning". Sometimes it was the Venus version though, like Ishtar, Astarte, Tanit, Inanna, etc.
>jewishThis isn't remotely related. As
>>19460172 points out, you're devastatingly confused. Not only does "Judaism" have nothing to do with the people in question, being invented in around mid 500s CE, what they've done is borrow perennial teachings from earlier cults/religions. Saying "judaism is evil" is idiotic because all they did was copy the popular thing to copy, which is by no means "evil", but just the standard picture of what ancients before them had painted.
Finally, see my other posts regarding "Left Hand Path". Just because Blavatsky's minions ruined the meanings doesn't mean they never had objective, cemented meanings.
