>>19485311>I'd say the online test is +-5 points accuratehmmmm way too accurate for an online test no? the creator himself says it only has an r correlation of 0.57 to the WAIS-II and a 0.55 to ACT scores
from interactions with smartasses at uni, dumbasses from the streets, common folk in everyday life, and reading some studies on the gifted, I estimate my own iq to be 104-112. no way I'm close to 124-134, despite that being what I tend to score on other online tests. sure as hell don't feel like it, and sure as hell don't look like it either in my daily performance lol
I've also always thought I'm somewhat on par to Ritsu's level of intelligence, with him being slightly or moderately smarter than me, judging from previous interactions, observations, and discussions with him. keep in mind that he tends to attract high iq larpers because he often flaunts being a genius during moodswings, so his debates against them provided a lot opportunities for comparison. my own iq estimate seems to be in good agreement with his professional score being somewhere around 115 and from what I've observed from those debates against high iq larpers, so my estimate is looking like a decent basis to use
also if you guys were +130iq, I don't think you would even bother coming here as much as you do because being that smart typically means the requirement for mental stimulation increases drastically. really. this place (all of 4chan) would bore the crap out of you, so your brain would highly discourage you from visiting frequently, even for casual engagement. from the gifted perspective, using this site would be like waiting 40 minutes in a line just to watch a snail slowly trudge across a stone - an excruciatingly painful waste of time and energy for most, and a huge trial of patience for all
at best, you'd be once in a blue moon posters
with that in mind, I think the online test's 140iq can be equivalent to a professional 120+-5iq when scaled to bantoids, but I need more data
