>>19583897>You fail to see the difference though it seems.No, I see the difference. You fail to see that OP is a blatant lie, as was your earlier post that I was responding to
>It doesn't, the sources are included there aswell if you want to compare. What harsher laws?I have before. I need to look it up again
>Whatever makes you feel better>Josephus was Vespasian's slave and then freed and became interpreter for Titus as he genocided his kin lol what a great example of Roman Pagans "inviting jews to subvert Europe".Ok, you failed to mention St Paul, who got his citizenship through his father, iirc, and the fact that there were Jewish legionaries who got citizenship through service. It was a much more lenient civic regime than under Christianity hegemony
>It did No
>and also the amount of jews as I said.They were down to 175 breeding pairs in the 1400s, you fucking moron
>What treaty btw? Was it something they had to do to save their kin or something they willingly did? Dependa on how you define "willingly," I guess. They wanted Charlemagne to leave.
>What treaty btw you didnt answer thatThere were several. Look up the saxon wars.
>>It was a subsidiary mission of his>Against the Saxons? Yes
>No, it was. The primary purpose was integration into the empire and the cession of Saxon raids into Frankish territory
>You aren't disproving this either. Just denying.>>Your sentence was unintelligible.>Let me rephrase then. European faiths weren't dying in any way, shape or form. It was getting subverted by enforcing laws, punishment and bribery by the largest power during that time, that sought to completely get rid of European ethnic faiths. This power being the Frankish kingdom led by Charlagay that had jews in his court.I mean, you're wrong there too. The Poles and Russians, completely out of Charlemagne's sphere of influence, were converting in their own
