>>19592665It's at the feet of women to find a man. And, it's not that difficult.
Nobody ever tells the truth. But I will.
1. 99.9% of women on OLD (online dating) never initiate messaging. This means, they only respond to men who message them.
2. 99.99% of women, even if they are "atheists" that don't believe in ghosts or magic or anything supernatural EXPECT men to be able to do magic. No special "spark" between you and her, and she's gonna bail.
The job of women is to attract, attract, attract. How do they do this? With hair-styles, clothes, and makeup. No amount of feminist empowerment or duos by Annie Lennox & Patty LaBelle will get women to suddenly do the opposite of what they are hardwired to do. Which is to sit-on-their-ass-and-wait.
Some women, the less than 1% who finally throw in the towel and go to a therapist who, hopefully, KNOWS the truth, will tell them:
1. Sweetheart, you should try initiating conversations on dating sites. Do your own searches looking for men than fit the parameters you've set.
2. Sweetheart, you shouldn't be so hard on men to suddenly do all of this "magic" for you. Only pick-up artists and schizos try and do magic and what does that get you? Heartbreak. Things take time. You need to see a man over a distance of ground - which is why things like school, the work place, or social scenes are more natural because then you see actual men over a distance of ground.
It is NOT that difficult. If a woman is unhappily single, that's 100% on her. If a woman is dating a schizo who's causing problems, that's 100% on her.
Obviously various philosophies get in the way of their ability to become happy. And they list them for you under political and religious categories.
"Liberal." Well, no wonder you're 40 and single.
"Atheist." Well, no wonder you're 40 and single.
"Catholic." Well, no wonder you're 40 and single.
"Christian." Well, no wonder you're 40 and single.
Not that a woman can't override these types of mental liabilities.