>>1962127>That 15% potential is his duty to maximize as best he canYou're over-stating exactly how much time is needed to properly raise children. Being a parent when kids are past childhood is mostly about creating/maintaining environments which they can learn about the world in. As I said, nutrition, quality of life, education. In other words, if you keep junk food out of your kids life, make sure they grow up on your land away from high crime areas, and home school them with proper educational plans. Your kids will turn out not only great but ahead of their peers by a wide margin.
Not only do you not need to be a helicopter parent, but doing so will actually harm their growth.
>He needs to spend as much time as is needed to do whatever is necessary for them If you're aware of what's necessary, this shouldn't be difficult to do even if you have a very large family.
>Which is not in his controlHow do you figure?
>This can't be done if you don't have the entire family in one roof Where are you getting the idea that this wouldn't be the case from? One man with three wives, with two kids from each, living in a two story house on 5 acres is entirely doable.
>Trying to keep up with each familyWhat're you talking about? Why would he and his wives and their kids not all live together?
>Won't spend as much time with themWhich I assume is tied to your idea of separate house holds for each wive and the kids he has with them rather then all being under one roof.
>R vs K selected hypothesis Not valid, it's a good opener for people unfamiliar with biology wanting to have a biological basis for human variation, but it's widely not applicable to reproduction patterns of animals or humans.
