>>19660264You just can’t be normal! You just can’t okay! You just can’t CURReNT_THING you just can’t okay!
I exist and yet cannot immediately get OP’s mom to deepthroat my dick, having her materialize right in front of me and just polish my dick.
Therefore I can argue that there is something that says I exist, but cannot do such things I do not have such permissions. Clearly I cannot be God, for if it were possible to do such things in a physical capacity as the universe clearly allows for such things to exist within such context but doesn’t allow sentience itself to allow for such things, clearly there is an objective authority that spares OP’s mom from sucking my dick.
Not just a philosophical moral authority, but a physically objective arbitrator of existence itself. Clearly a sub characteristic of all things created is an inability to create itself. Which not only makes logical sense, it contrasts the nature of finite beings with the capability of an infinite eternal being. Matter can’t be created or destroyed by observation yet it exists by the very same observation.
You are not only a liar if you say there is no such thing as morality, you are paradoxically incorrect simultaneously the moment you say it, and just paradox is only possible in a context where you have free will, since the truth of the situation even in a physical capacity cannot stop you from violating logic, which your environment functions off of as apparent by scientific observation.
In short, OP’s mom is spared by God and the fact that I can’t make her materialize in front of me not only proves that matter can not be created or destroyed it means I’m not allowed to do such things willfully despite wanting to, proving there is a moral way to go about things, I do have free will, but will doesn’t manipulate the properties of the context itself.
