>>19749975It's very easy but very blackpilling. Women want sex and resources, but the strategies to obtain them are very different.
Sex is easy:
>approach guy, IRL or in app>flirt with guy, flatter him, compliment him, touch him>if he's receptive, invite to obvious escalation of sexual tension (e.g., dancing), or just ask to go somewhere with him for sex>sexResources are tougher because you can't approach someone and just ask, you have to make them think they can exchange the resources for something:
>make self look appealing, pretty, neotenous features, fertility signals (lipstick, blush, etc.)>wait for guy to show interest>play hard to get, make it clear he has to work harder for a chance at sex/romance/attention>repeat until satisfied with resources obtainedThis is why there's nothing stupider than asking a woman out on a date, or going on a date with a woman. If you need to approach a woman, don't expect sex, romance, attention, etc. expect her to demand (implicitly or explicitly) resources in exchange for the possibility to obtain those things. That's the definition of dating. "Possibility" is key because the brain is hardwired to seek out probabilistic but large rewards (lottery, "dating") instead of secure but smaller rewards (keeping your own fucking money lmao). This is why people lose all their money in the stock market, but nobody ever got addicted to fixed-income treasury bonds.
My hatred for women grows exponentially by the day. I'm consistently in awe of the consistency of the rate of acceleration of its growth. My 23&Me says I'm more than 100% Kazakh.
These posts are based:
>>19749976>>19749977>>19749979These are morons, liars, shills, or (god forgive me) women.
>>19749981>>19749980>>19749982And especially
>>19749978Women, men, ants, rats, etc. seek value and learn the behaviors necessary to obtain it. Literally the definition of life.
