>>19755099>I said "Semitic Samael", I didn't say the Gnostic Samael.That's what I'm telling you - they're the same guy. Did you just try to tell me Gnostics were "Jewish"? Make up your mind.
>Talmudic SamaelThe talmud was a secular book for schools. The Edomites are ancient Royal Aryans that raped the desert mutts, creating Loxism.
>by the GnosticsWay more than that.
>>19755102>Yahweh, set, Marduk, moloch, SatanYahweh was Yehu or Akenhaten. We just covered Set. Marduk was Jupiter-Zeus. Moloch was sometimes Venus and sometimes Moloch and sometimes the "Leader" of the group. We covered Satan too.
>first creature who corrupted creation. No they're not. Two of them are titles, one of them is a modern iteration of an ancient name, one of them is the son of Enki who was for a time a dick.
>>19755105>we wuz jewsThis is distinctly linguistic propaganda. It's a complete reframe of the argument. The argument is not and never was "we want to be jews, guys!", but instead, "jews weren't even around until 500 CE". I'm not claiming I'm Jewish, but that that wasn't even a thing until centuries later.
Phoenicians are the Irish are the Egyptians (at least some of them). Jesus' uncle controlled the ancient Tin trade, which was crucial to the Bronze Age. What does that mean to you, anon? It means his family was at the very least unfathomably wealthy and expert navigators by sea if we're to believe the stories of their infamous navigation tactics to obscure the locations of the mines.
This is a serious grievance against Truth, anon. No one has heard this side of the story for obvious reasons.
>Probably a lot of it is biased and heavily mythologized.There are only so many stories.
