>>19924795>No, purposely misreading something is your way of squirming out of responding to itI still responded to it in the next line. You lie again
>That’s not a “deflection” you moron it’s directly referring to what you said. You deflected to Chronology.
>They didn’t, They did
>and their writings are dated at the earliest to 70 ADA lie. Liberal datings put them decades earlier.
>It’s not even claimed that they were contemporary to JesusThe authors were contemporary to Jesus. You keep deflecting to dates to avoid this
>There’s a fucking entire mythology, they have creatures that had no head So you can't do it, thanks. You cannot show me a report of an incident that is not believable, you must dishonestly pretend I was talking about folk lore.
Hence, you were lying. I accept your concession, liar.
>you are in fact suggesting an absence of evidence is somehow evidence of the event, retardA lie. I am not doing this. You are claiming the lack of contemporary evidence of a resurrection story is evidence in your mind that it didn't happen.
You are a liar, and a hypocrite
>Lmao I agree????? You agree the burden is on you? Then you accept defeat because you cannot meet that burden.
I successfully argued that we do not expect any of those "documents" to have survived or even be made
You responded with nothing but cope, lies and delusions that a grave robbing report would last 2000 years.
>Except you refer exactly to it and mentioned how the romans recorded multiple people pretending to be the messiahA blatant lie
>Which also mentions multiple battles that never happened A lie
>You again reference a Roman history regarding Jesus
Romans didn't write the gospels you absolute moron
>but insist that they just “wouldn’t care” if his tomb was emptyI correctly argued this fact. You could not refute it, you merely displayed your ignorance about roman soldiers
Your lives are getting more numerous which is clear evidnece you have lost
