>>19937982When you ask them what the morally relevant difference between humans and pigs is that justifies killing and eating one but not the other they'll often say "being human" . But then what about the millions of human beings aborted and killed in IVF ?
When you ask a pro choicer at what point does it become immoral/should be illegal to kill A human being (conception, heart Beat, consciousness, fetal pain, viability, birth, etc) they'll often say viability or consciousness or birth or whatever but a chicken or pig is conscious, viable outside the womb, has a heartbeat, has been born, can feel pain etc, but they're fine with killing pigs and chickens and humans before they are born, viable, conscious, etc but think it's murder to kill a human being after that point. It makes no sense and is hypocritical.
Nothing makes sense. Am I wrong?
