>Beatrice of Vermandois (aged about 10) was married to Robert, Margrave of Neustria (aged about 24; later King of West Francia), in c.890
>Beatrice of Vermandois (aged about 10) was married to Robert, Margrave of Neustria (aged about 24; later King of West Francia), in c.890
>Matilda of England (aged about 12), daughter of Henry I of England, was married to Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor (aged about 28), in 1114. They had been officially betrothed four years prior, in 1110, when Matilda was just eight; and a few months following the betrothal, Matilda was crowned Queen of the Romans.
>Sibylla of Anjou (aged about 11) was married to William Clito (aged 20/21) in 1123. The marriage was annulled the following year on the grounds of consanguinity.
>Gertrude of Bavaria (aged about 11 or 14) was married to Frederick IV, Duke of Swabia (aged 20/21), in 1166.
Matilda of England (aged 11), daughter of Henry II of England, was married to Henry the Lion (aged about 37/39) in 1168.
Two points to make here, firstly the prophet Muhammad did not consummate the marriage when Aisha was 9, that was only once she had hit puberty and was a young adult, scholars believe it's somewhere between the ages of 14-18. Second point is what is quoted above, incase you're a brainlet which most hindus are, it shows times were different back then everyone including christians, hindus, jews, whatever other religion were marrying very young. There's no real point applying modern norms to those times. Also, i don't think you people understand what "hadith" are, there are tons of these quotes posted as if it somehow disproves Islam, even though anyone who isn't double digit IQ and has done even a sliver of research can tell you nearly all the hadiths you posted are not reliable at all. Notice how you never post direct verses from the Quran which has been conserved since the beginning unlike the Bible which has been modified/altered god knows how many times. Hindu Dindus need to stop vpnlarping as white.
