>>20127854Ai is the easy part anon, it's not even necessary for robowaifus, just a buzzword nowadays
>>20127839You literally can, it's not that complicated
>>20127888This, the main appeal of robowaifus is that they surpass human females as no human is perfect but robots can be and appearance can be personalized
>>20127895Don't lose hope bro, I'm an ivy league graduate with PhD in robotics and I'm full time working on it, will post progress here
>>20127904Here's the thing, current humanoid robots approaches like atlas, digit, Nadia, etc. can never achieve the ideal robowaifus that are indistinguishable from humans, this is fundamental in their mechanical designs and actuation framework. But those are the easy way to achieve what you described semi working robowaifus, as making a humanoid is not hard these days. they can walk on their own, perform simple tasks, aka a generalist robot that some autists can use for sex
My current approach is to make them as close to humans as possible, not just appearance, but the temperature, natural motion, the soft touch, both static and dynamic, ie the contraction and expansion of the muscles, you can feel her biceps/triceps become slightly stiffer as you hold hands, imagine pounding her ass as it bounces in various frequencies at different sexual tension levels, her chest going up and down as her breath heavies, and there are a lot more nuances to tricking our brains into thinking it's a human
Those are not features that you and add onto later on, at least not at current level of technologies, you have to design and integrate them from the start by sacrificing other features, in this case it wouldn't be able to do any meaningful tasks or even walk on its own, but in return it will be almost like a real human during designated motions (which we can expand on later on), I'm talking about Doggystyle, missionary stuff like that
Which one do you think you and "normies" would pay for, I'm determined on the second path thoughbeit
