>>20534083Oh motherfucker you have no goddamned idea how wrong you are. Tomboys are not just straight from a modern perspective (
>>20534064 as webmrel so elegantly described), they are the definition of what a woman is supposed to be. This is not just personal preference, it's fucking in our genetics.
Turn back the clock about twenty thousand years, back to the days of stone and caves. We humans didn't live very long, and our days were rife with fending off predators and competing tribes. So when Grug decides he wants to fuck and make babby, who is he gonna choose? The delicate little flower that will probably die during childbirth, constantly needs protection, and will raise her children to depend on others in the tribe? Or the fit, muscular proto-tomboy that has proven time and again she can defend herself against a fucking cougar and raise her children to do the same?
Liking strong, muscular females who can bear strong offspring is in our DNA. It's in the DNA of EVERY animal, not just humans. You think lionesses sit and wait like dainty little waifs for a lion to come by and sweep them off their feet? You think male swans are lining up to find the weakest, most pathetic female they can find? Even those animals who reproduce primarily through raping a viable female do their best to find mates that are proven to be strong, and only mate with weaker specimens if they do not have any other option.
Tomboys are not just straight, they are what nature intended. Anything else is a fucking aberration. You are the incorrect one, you absolute fucking genetic clown.
