>>20676454Anon, how would anyone know how much another person was paid to sign a secrecy agreement
Still waiting for those adult topics you can talk with a child about that your defense is that "I didn't really mean what I said, and we never exchanged pics or met up" that isn't sexting
Also why an innocent man who got libelled as having been caught sexting a child put out a statement that didn't say "None of that is true, nothing like that is true, you just cost me a job and I'll see you in court" but "Well, I had inappropriate conversations with that child but I didn't really mean what I was saying, and I didn't exchange pics with her or meet up with her in real life"
>>20676465>the legal eagle who didn't know what "text" meant is back>our insistence on ignoring effects of the elephant in the room of an existing NDA is more than a bit curious. It's not like we don't notice it.The NDA was broken. This is a little more complicated than what "text" means, but NDAs work by a principle called "mutuality of obligation" - the thread won't last while you look up what those big words mean, so I'll make it simple: that means when one party breaks that obligation, all are released from it. Everyone can talk about it now. He talked about it, by admitting it was true, instead of doing what an innocent man would do, which is say "That is absolute bullshit, I never did anything of the like with any minor, I'm going to sue you."
>Twitch got money for it? Twitch is going to get money when they get sued for breach of contract?What? Twitch employees with knowledge would've got some money to sign an NDA (and keep their jobs).
