[40 / 12 / ?]
>>472854670
>>472855597
Redpill me on what esoteric or symbolic insight I can gain by 'flat erf'.
As an actual model that represents the inner mechanical physical working of the universe it is unworkable and leads to the consuming abyss of schizophrenic nothingness. Accepting flat earth is chaos. We live in a snow globe? That is inside a simulation inside an instance of a hypervisor? Satellites are fake? Stars are pixel tracking cameras?
The only coherent worldview of 'flat earf' is that it is a deeply human centered perspective; if you can't see it, touch it, fuck or eat it what use does it have to me and if it doesn't then notmyproblem.bmp
What does a duck care of newtonian models. Flat earth is a rejection of the concerns of the ration mind/eye and an embrace of the intuitive. Is that it?
>>472855597
Redpill me on what esoteric or symbolic insight I can gain by 'flat erf'.
As an actual model that represents the inner mechanical physical working of the universe it is unworkable and leads to the consuming abyss of schizophrenic nothingness. Accepting flat earth is chaos. We live in a snow globe? That is inside a simulation inside an instance of a hypervisor? Satellites are fake? Stars are pixel tracking cameras?
The only coherent worldview of 'flat earf' is that it is a deeply human centered perspective; if you can't see it, touch it, fuck or eat it what use does it have to me and if it doesn't then notmyproblem.bmp
What does a duck care of newtonian models. Flat earth is a rejection of the concerns of the ration mind/eye and an embrace of the intuitive. Is that it?
