>>20771959>meritocracyI'm not really sure what this means. But in nature, resources belong to those to have the ability to aquire them.
But that doesn't mean the the strongest lion eats all the meat all the time, otherwise the rest of the pride would starve or attack and overthrow him and so, the lion has to share his hunt.
Now, in modern soceity the ability to aquire resources is much more complex with politics (not just major, but even in the smallest interactions) can be compared to the lions might. However it should also be stated the physical force still remains a factor amoung human society (millitary force being the obvious example) but physical force is most often used as a means to threaten and suppres rather than....
cant be bothered to continue. but basically
>might makes rightthe only adjustment to the statement is that "might" does not entirely refer to physical power.
