>>20781064>This is a gross exaggeration of the process.I think you mean "oversimplification" and yes, I concede that for the purposes of modeling a system, it's often helpful to simplify it. A weather model is useful, and can help you understand the path of a hurricane, even though it is vastly more simple than the real atmosphere.
>The vast majority of women very rarely fuck a top tier guy despite the occasional exception to the rule.I disagree, just because, from experience, I have never men a woman older than about 25, who doesn't have all of the following experiences:
(1) "catching feelings" - meaning, she slept with a guy that she knew wasn't going to commit to her, but she thought to herself, "it's okay, it's just sex" - then she discovered she was emotionally hooked and couldn't get away.
(2) "hoe stories" or "a hoe phase" - even supposedly good girls, if you find a way to get them talking about their life, will admit to things like, going backstage at a concert and fucking the band, or taking a trip and fucking some exceptionally attractive man.
I've heard thousands of these stories. I have a knack for getting people to open up, but also sometimes I get the stories from friends and family.
(3) a top-tier guy "friend" who, it turns out, they have hooked up with.
Yes, even plain girls, even supposedly good girls, have these experiences. They have all fucked top-tier men.
>Just think about it, there aren't enough top guys to go around.That's naive of you. The difference in male and female libido is HUGE. 10% of men can absolutely, very easily, occupy 80% or 90% of women.
Why do you think that so many women complain about being a "side piece" or having hooked up with a guy who had a dozen other women? How can that be true given you, and all your friends, will go your whole life without ever having even one "side piece"
The answer is obvious: women are all fucking a tiny percentage of men. That's the only possible explanation that fits all the facts
