>>20837787Why does B not get to decide who gets the flute she has made, why is A arguing with a third-party busybody and asking B for permission to use the flute or barters for it, why is C not asking B to teach him the skills necessary to craft instruments or to work alongside B, maybe run the errands or accounting?
Judging by B's argumentation the third-party busybody you're supposed to assume the role of in this scenario hasn't given her anything in exchange, so the whole argument falls apart from the get go. Had B been compensated then she would not be in the picture anymore, so only A has a claim.and C should ask her to teach him the skills to play it and sgare it, or barter for it.
>you're supposed to be some kind parental figure in this scenarioAgain, that falls apart immediately. Why would a custodian take away an (self-made) item from one child to arbitarily hand it to another? That's just instigating conflict.
>but it's meant to illustrate communism and capitalismIsn't it curious that communism and capitalism are eager to tell you what to do with "money", but not who prints it, who owns it, who loans it, who demands interest and to whom you are indebted to?
"Money" is deceisively not currency -- it's not backed by or standing in for anything but the susceptibility and malleability of the human mind; at all times there exists simultanousely too much, too little and none at all; [current] year it isn't even physically printed or digitally generated anymore, but merely assumed to exist in the past as debt, in the present as credit and in the future as intetest in whatever arbitarily huge volumes necessary to incentivize, motiviate and outright control yout behaviour; (...). But eh, I digress.
