[309 / 142 / ?]
Quoted By: >>21012146 >>21012147 >>21012148 >>21012150 >>21012153 >>21012156 >>21012157 >>21012167 >>21012168 >>21012171 >>21012173 >>21012194 >>21012199 >>21012205 >>21012214 >>21012227 >>21012228 >>21012259 >>21012282 >>21012308 >>21012323 >>21012343 >>21012348 >>21012350 >>21012411 >>21012416 >>21014063
so why was racemixing selected for in an evolutionary process/ why did god build in this fatal flaw into human biology?
does it serve as a last resort to maintain ones genes in situation in which there is no mate of equal race available so one could let the higher quality genes come to the foreground again in subsequent generations through the process of eugenics? is it better to preseve ones own genes through a mutt child rather than not procreating at all and let ones genetic legacy end? the mutt child would then be merely a carrier of a hidden backup.
if a white chad ends up in the rainforest with no chance of escaping during his lifetime should he breed the native negros?
another proposed theory is that a certain amount of foreign blood could actually be beneficial. in dog breeding one does mix in more aggressive traits into otherwise noble but timid types to achieve a more well-rounded result.
does it serve as a last resort to maintain ones genes in situation in which there is no mate of equal race available so one could let the higher quality genes come to the foreground again in subsequent generations through the process of eugenics? is it better to preseve ones own genes through a mutt child rather than not procreating at all and let ones genetic legacy end? the mutt child would then be merely a carrier of a hidden backup.
if a white chad ends up in the rainforest with no chance of escaping during his lifetime should he breed the native negros?
another proposed theory is that a certain amount of foreign blood could actually be beneficial. in dog breeding one does mix in more aggressive traits into otherwise noble but timid types to achieve a more well-rounded result.
