Pivoting away from older porn stars bumping content, Is the human Biota Crossover policy in the genetic algorithm an informed interleave? In in which way is this interleave informed?
Answer:
1. The inseminated egg swims in the the father's immune system, B-lyphocytes and T-helpers, and other in-molecule performance summaries for a while, and the first keys to emerge from that blastocyst engage with those to take samples. Which provide for not only how to make a human, but into which places and how well the locations on disk worked over the human service lifetime.
2. The age of the woman, and the fact that the woman has access to her own immune system, which is able to code performance analysis over the lifetime of the riggings, is also available, which gives the mother the ability to say things such as but not limited to: "Our gas exchange system shit the bed multiple times and the fathers is coming back better, use that instead of ours".
3. In-cell tournements, both dna strands are executed at the same time, and the place is made for the "unit tests" and "performance checks" of the apparatus being created, gets collected, in that way, the poorer performing instruction sets get pushed into a vat of acid and denatured so the superior can explore the space and express.
In these three ways, the mother is not randomly picking sides when choosing the DNA of the child. The crossover policy interlace scheme is informed, it's a fat man at a buffet waiting for the best dish to come out before filling up the plate. It's a jackal and an imperial stretchmark nay it's an albatross, it's a machine learning algorithm in protien folding at the molecular level. Neurons are just its network ethernet card for songs to opcode route and replicate to the neighbor destinations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7Ck7V02Wic 
