[7 / 2 / 1]
Quoted By: >>21053235 >>21053277 >>21053286
Honestly, kill all pedos.
HOWEVER, there is a flaw with age of consent laws and I have a suspicion it serves no other purpose than to decrease fertility.
What is wrong with two 14 yearold having an arranged marriage and shitting out 20 kids? their brains won't develop until 25 anyways. should we push age of consent to 25?
The problem is age gap. a 14 year old should not be with a 35 year old (manipulation factors). a 14 year old and a 16 yearold ok? but a 14 year old with 19 year old is 'weirder' than a 14 with another 14/16year old.
the way we have it an 18 year old with a 80 year old is completely legal (it shouldn't be).
There should be an age gap law that titrates/adjusts based of the age of the two people, not an arbitrary age where magically they can fuck old men to gold dig. BUT if the real purpose was to save children, they would investigate epstein and other actual pedo rings rather than chasing normies for going with a 17 yearold.
HOWEVER, there is a flaw with age of consent laws and I have a suspicion it serves no other purpose than to decrease fertility.
What is wrong with two 14 yearold having an arranged marriage and shitting out 20 kids? their brains won't develop until 25 anyways. should we push age of consent to 25?
The problem is age gap. a 14 year old should not be with a 35 year old (manipulation factors). a 14 year old and a 16 yearold ok? but a 14 year old with 19 year old is 'weirder' than a 14 with another 14/16year old.
the way we have it an 18 year old with a 80 year old is completely legal (it shouldn't be).
There should be an age gap law that titrates/adjusts based of the age of the two people, not an arbitrary age where magically they can fuck old men to gold dig. BUT if the real purpose was to save children, they would investigate epstein and other actual pedo rings rather than chasing normies for going with a 17 yearold.
