>>21057578Eel or snake eats bigger prey. Detracted jaws for swallowing larger prey. It then ingests over a longer period by not needing to eat for longer periods. Many animals have this.
Evolution no. The concept has flaws despite of certain patterns where animals adapt. Symmetry becomes discounted. Because Evolution is far to random and vague. There is symbiosis in nature, not explained by evolution and instead it makes abhorrent conjecture. Every animal has a role creating balance, and each are suited to their habitats, thriving in them, creating an otherwise equation into ecosystems which rely on its different and unique species. Along comes evolution and creates monsters. It is redundant of the habitats and species in them. It needs an explanation on life began but it has not provided how it thrives. It has discounted how animals play a much larger part in their environments. Dinosaurs are ignorant, where are the flora and fuana with big huge crater making dinosaurs eating so much vegetation a week. Why didn't they evolve back into dinosaurs. Croc, snake, lizard. Many are apex and had no other threats. Every species evolves in tandem, look outside. They cancel each other out, and in unison are symbiotic of their habitats. Flora and fauna need animals as much as animals need it. If an imbalance occurs, nature corrects it.
Of course humans have changed this. We have seemingly become invasive towards that natural order by changing habitats and ecosystems to suite our own lifestyles. Perhaps becoming out of balance to any other life. Evolution??
An evolutionary mistake? How in the equation found look at it? Symbiotic. Symmetry. A redundant theory relying on the premise it needed to explain life
