[16 / 3 / ?]
Quoted By: >>21061200 >>21061431 >>21061612 >>21061917
With the exception of maybe Socrates / Plato, every single great thinker, philosophy and religion which thrived thought little of women.
Were they all incels?
>Buddha
Described them as mostly incapable, mostly unattuned to any spiritual dimension of reality, and simply uncapable of reaching salvation. He seemed to suspect that they have no capacity to entertain abstract thoughts, not nearly enough to be equal to men.
>Confucian
Mostly useless creatures that can barely be expected to fulfill familial duties, with a disposition for irrationality that would never be accepted in a civilized man.
>Bible
Women are lesser creatures and should only obey and respect their men. For their own good. Can barely be expected to do so.
>Nietzsche
Same as Buddha, women just do not care about anything and are mostly useless, comfort-seeking creatures who lead to decline when they pass those traits to men.
Were they all incels?
>Buddha
Described them as mostly incapable, mostly unattuned to any spiritual dimension of reality, and simply uncapable of reaching salvation. He seemed to suspect that they have no capacity to entertain abstract thoughts, not nearly enough to be equal to men.
>Confucian
Mostly useless creatures that can barely be expected to fulfill familial duties, with a disposition for irrationality that would never be accepted in a civilized man.
>Bible
Women are lesser creatures and should only obey and respect their men. For their own good. Can barely be expected to do so.
>Nietzsche
Same as Buddha, women just do not care about anything and are mostly useless, comfort-seeking creatures who lead to decline when they pass those traits to men.