>>21212420Schizo take:
Swift's artificially-driven popularity was a product of AI/ML/algorithms being developed by the defence/intelligence agencies - it was a test run for swaying elections.
I get Swift being popular - she was a good looking white girl who seemed wholesome enough. What I don't believe is organic is her selling out stadiums every single night around the world which register on seismometers. THAT kind of popularity is for the best of the best at what they do. And Swift isn't the best singer, not the best dancer, not the best writer, etc. Her music is formulaic, it's good, but not great.
And it's somewhat recent that she's gone insanely popular. There was a noticeable step-change a few years ago. And I think that was them activating this system to sway/nudge people into believing someone is popular, and that they should like/support them. They know the *appearance* of popularity actually DRIVES genuine popularity. It's why they zoom-in so tight at Trump rallies, and why that's what they're trying so hard to project Kameltoe as having.
Swift knows too much to be allowed out of the clutches of the intelligence/political sphere. She'll do what the "celebrities" all do: start an NGO/foundation to funnel your wealth into projects/politicians for your goals. If it seems like she'll out them at any point, they'll Clinton her.
