>>21219179This site isn't valuable anymore, but it's worth noting that arguing exactly 18 being essential is the coin flip of her being 17 and 364 days old.
You're trapped with a focus on sex of what relationships are. Even 'legal' at 18, if you're so focused on getting someone at 18, you have to re-evaluate how you look, since you're probably no better than a predator evaluating a slab of meat.
It is by 18 things should be certain to take that next step, if it should happen, not that it should. So this isn't an argument for ambiguity, I support 18 being the age of consent. Just remember that this argument has people arguing "lawsexual", being brutally dismissive, and complicating it because of the zeitgeist focus on socially detached sexual behaviour and the empirical reality of calendar months.
