>>21231849Derp derp derp.
>Some women are trashNah. Some men are trash. Some men are extraordinary. Some men are homeless. Some men are billionaires.
All women are more or less the same. Clustered by mother nature/evolution toward a very, very narrow mean.
Risk- and initiative-taking outliers among them have been whittled away by natural selection over eons of time.
They all have the same interests/hobbies, which all revolve around getting the attention of attractive men.
They all have malleable "belief sets" that depend heavily upon what is socially- and familialy-accepted by the people around them.
And they all follow the same behavioral arc:
In their late teens/early 20's, they are solipsistic, impulsive, and shamelessly capricious because they can be, which makes them shit to be around.
They judge men entirely reflexively rather than based on their own assessments, so a man who ignores them or treats them like shit "must be" doing so because he is better than her and therefore a catch, and a man who expresses interest/desire "must be" doing so
In their 30's they are suddenly humbled by aging and become desperate/start reaching back out to the men they ignored as inferior. They are scraping the barrel so hard their fingernails are coming off.
Which, once again, makes them...shit to be around.
Women bitch all the time about not wanting to be objectified. This is only because some objects have zero value.
What women really want is to be commodified.
They are absolutely obsessed with rank order and hierarchy when it comes to men, so it is only fair that you treat them the same way.
No one woman should ever be particularly important to you, nor should you lead any woman to believe she is.
A man should always court multiple women, and allocate your time and attention based on which of them behave best toward you.
