>>21382944Replace sin with mistakes/consequences and its the same thing
>>21382946>Can they though?I have, yes
>Most non-religious people are not evil by any means, but they are generally more interested in providing frivolous luxuries for themselves than doing good for GodNo shit, they do it for others because they believe it's good, not because a god thinks so. And the flipside can be said for the religious. They do it for the end reward, not because it's genuinely good
>See without a phone I could give less, for example today I called a dialysis technician to tell him his dialysis machine is full of bacteria and he should clean it, this did more good than selling said phone for money and giving the money to charity.And the disciples probably could've gotten around a lot faster with horses, but that never happened either. And why not just pray to your God to reach out on your behalf and/or just heal them?
