>>21424737It's unavoidable. If capitalist A can lower the price of a product , by lowering the price of labor, he will out compete capitalist B who doesn't lower the price of labor and whose product is more expensive while having the same quality.
The profit logic commands that the labor price must be as low as possible, hence its logical to outsource labor or lower price of labor by importing immigrants.
>Your country worked great before you imported everyoneFor a period of 20 maybe 40 years after the war when germany was pumped up by "marshall-plan" credits to rebuild economy? Yes such stages exist in capitalism but they are merely stages. it was also important to keep the people satisfied as a means to prevent communist ideas to be spreading, in the cold war that was a real issue. So to look better in comparism against the eastern block, things must look good. There are more elaborate explanations why this can only be a temporary period in capitalism, but I can't remember anymore, desu.
>>21424794>They want everyone to be equally poor.That is also what capitalism wants, poor competitors means competitors without capital means broke competitors, means no competitors.
No capitalist has interest in increasing the capital of any possible competitors.
>And how did that go for you?What? you mean eastern germany or what?
>with less opportunity to start a business because everything is centralized and kiked upbut anon starting a business means exploiting the labor of your fellow man for your own profits, people don't do that in communism.
planned economy is fundamentally different from capitalist pseudo-free market economy
>It's because Blackrockisn't blackrock part of capitalism? so how is this an argument for capitalism?
> real CAPITALISMpls explain what real capitalism looks like and how it is better.
>not saying Capitalism is perfect but it's the best we havedoubt + even if dat would be true. Isn't it fair to think bout improvement?
