>>21523293>what are the main arguments and evidenceThey misunderstand or misuse scientific things like aircraft lift and
A large portion of his "200 proofs" are just "We see too far" where he ignores atmospheric refraction or observer height, and he often just lies about distances.
Another big one is misunderstanding inertial frames of reference, where they don't understand conservation of momentum (they think if you jump up, the ground should rush beneath you if it were rotating)
In other words, it's all easily refuted horseshit packaged in a way to appeal to gullible retards who don't bother to think about anything past the next TikTok meme
