Quoted By:
Given that a lowlift is 1000 to 1 at best and 100000 to 1 at worst, to argue superior genetic representation in the deep future you would have to at the very least have 1 thousand children by different protohominid females for a full 100% chance of outperforming 3 children by another that reached the top of human evolution.
An argument might be made that if you can put a spin on the ball, then you could do it in as little as a hundred, but if you dice roll shit, then you'd have to get this up to ten thousand, or god help you 1 hundred thousand, for a parity evolution.
Could be anywhere from 100 children, to ten thousand children to reach parity, depending on approach and details you can control.
Your white DNA will be bare punching 7 stations over its category in those thousand people, however, by sheer numbers, and that evolution rewards a randomly isolated victory disproportionately, 100 kids by 100 women in the 3rd world plus positive spin, is an equal evolution, the sacrifice is that the top of the mountain doesn't get higher, but the sub-peaks get higher.
