>>21649463Yes. Very much
>>21649462A prime example here. Only women are so bent out of shape about insecurities in others, a man wouldn't use "insecure" as an insult. We all have them to varying degrees. it's a fact of life. But a woman cannot accept insecurity in men. To a woman, insecurity in a man is worthy of intense vitriol and disgust. To a man, it's not something they care much about in women, and may even find endearing. They won't berate other men for unless they are a mangina raised only by women. If you have an opinion or make an observation that isn't flattering, or is inconvenient or disagreeable to all or any women, they will pull out they "insecure" card whether it makes sense or not
Women are inherently insecure. And if a woman is reading this, she will see it as an attack rather than an observation. But it is not an attack when I say this
A woman goes from cradle to grave feeling insecure about how weak they are. About how much smaller they are to men. About their capabilities compared to men. They are always comparing themselves to men. They feel vulnerable just coexisting with men, because they are. They require care while in birth, and require assistance raising their offspring. And so they seek security in men, it is a psychological phenomenon brought on by their weaker biology. They care so much about men's insecurities because of this. As I said, it is projection
If you see people online liberally accusing people of insecurities, you can always tell this way 90% of the time it is a woman. 9% of the time it's going to be a weak/gay man, and 1% of the time it might just be a man who has picked this up from women and thinks they are actually arguing a point with this Ad Hominem
