/bant/ - International/Random » Thread #21680801

[42 / 3 / ?]

63KiB, 336x362, IMG_7636.jpg

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:43:43 No.21680801 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>21680802 >>21680803 >>21680804 >>21680805 >>21680806 >>21680808 >>21680812 >>21680816 >>21680830 >>21680832 >>21680835 >>21680836 >>21680838 >>21680862

Does /pol/ know basic algebra?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:44:25 No.21680802 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680801
mudslime propaganda

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:45:14 No.21680803 Report

Quoted By: >>21680827

>>21680801
>MUH IMAGINARY REDDIT NUMBERS!!!
Literal soiboy algebra

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:48:04 No.21680804 Report

Quoted By: >>21680807 >>21680810 >>21680815

>>21680801
4 to 5 is wrong. Sqrt operation isn't commutative or whatever the terminology is.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:48:07 No.21680805 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680801
Should have asked me when I was in uni solving multivariable integrals, lil' man.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:49:24 No.21680806 Report

Quoted By: >>21680815

>>21680801
Square root of 1 is (-1,1) jesus fucking christ.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:50:15 No.21680807 Report

Quoted By: >>21680809 >>21680811 >>21680815 >>21680826

>>21680804
What is the square root of 4 plus the square root of 9
What is the square root of 4*9

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:50:54 No.21680808 Report

Quoted By: >>21680820

>>21680801
I can’t even trust math anymore, holy shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:51:13 No.21680809 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680807
times*

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:51:36 No.21680810 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680804
/Thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:51:42 No.21680811 Report

Quoted By: >>21680813

>>21680807
you forgot to answer his question pseud

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:52:41 No.21680812 Report

Quoted By: >>21680815

>>21680801
>anon shows us he's bad at math
Step 5 is the problem. That is not possible. A thread died for this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:55:34 No.21680813 Report

Quoted By: >>21680814

>>21680811
Multiplication is after exponentially. You can’t separate those negatives before handing the exponential. The proof by contradiction is literally right there. Assume you can separate negative roots and you see the contradiction. 2=0 is proof you are not allowed to do that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:56:45 No.21680814 Report

Quoted By: >>21680817

>>21680813
>assume
no, learn to fucking teach

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:57:11 No.21680815 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680812
>>21680804
>>21680806
>>21680807

all wrong

>t. 150 IQ

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:57:36 No.21680816 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680801
Your error is in steps 3 to 4 to 5

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:58:23 No.21680817 Report

Quoted By: >>21680818 >>21680822

>>21680814
What is a proof by contradiction for 300 Alex

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:59:19 No.21680818 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680817
what is abuse of power tyrant

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:59:26 No.21680819 Report

Quoted By:

Also here is the correct method:

6/2(1+2)
=3/1(1+2)
=3/(1+2)
=3/(3)
=1

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 22:59:48 No.21680820 Report

Quoted By: >>21680821 >>21680823

>>21680808
Math is a language, there is nothing to trust. Anyone can lie to you using any language they want.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:01:23 No.21680821 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680820
anyone will*

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:01:51 No.21680822 Report

Quoted By: >>21680824 >>21680825

>>21680817
take your meds, you've never passed calculus much less an analysis class

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:02:05 No.21680823 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680820
So is c++ but yet here you are, on a computer spreading your bullshit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:03:00 No.21680824 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680822
I have. Can you talk about the problem and not me.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1731385499415853.jpg, 75KiB, 559x682

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:03:18 No.21680825 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680822

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:04:54 No.21680826 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680807
Now give us the generalized form of this operation

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:05:35 No.21680827 Report

Quoted By: >>21680828 >>21680829

>>21680803
It has real world applications.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:06:54 No.21680828 Report

Quoted By: >>21680831

>>21680827
not as many as a catapult

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:06:57 No.21680829 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680827
I wasn’t expecting to agree with a Russian today but here we are. Comped numbers predict circuit current and voltage.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:07:25 No.21680830 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680801
3,4 and 7 are only half right as sqrt can give a +- not just +. 5,6,8 and 9 are wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:08:17 No.21680831 Report

Quoted By: >>21680833

>>21680828
You literally need complex numbers to expanse pendulum motion.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:08:19 No.21680832 Report

Quoted By: >>21680834 >>21680837

>>21680801
Really if you wanted to try this bullshit OP, you should have gone from step 4 to sqrt (-1)^2 = -1 and saved yourself several steps

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:09:31 No.21680833 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680831
youre talking about trebuchets, no tribute for you nigger, suck my dick

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:09:34 No.21680834 Report

Quoted By: >>21680849

>>21680832
What?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1664584757079813.jpg, 91KiB, 568x688

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:09:45 No.21680835 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680801
>muh squiggly lines explain how 2 = 0
thats cool , keep digging the hole

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:10:03 No.21680836 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680801
You can't divide by 0, faggot

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:10:11 No.21680837 Report

Quoted By: >>21680849

>>21680832
inb4 show work

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:11:06 No.21680838 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680801
No but I don’t need to to know 8 and 9 are wrong

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Z2Vx6uDy Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:13:55 No.21680849 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680834
>>21680837
1: 2 = 2
2: 2 = 1 + 1
3: 2 = 1 + sqrt 1
4: 2 = 1 + sqrt((-1)(-1))
Then the fake step you use should be undoing the squaring of -1 via the (negative) root
8: 2 = 1 - 1
This skips steps 5, 6 and 7 and side-steps imaginary numbers.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:WanND576 Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:16:10 No.21680862 Report

Quoted By:

>>21680801
At step 4 you are beginning to evaluate the imaginary component of 2.
The imaginary component of the quantity 2 is 0 and that's the answer you got.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:yKZyEow1 Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:17:58 No.21680866 Report

Quoted By:

You all are massive faggots

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:f4BrItCd Sun 01 Dec 2024 23:20:15 No.21680876 Report

Quoted By:

Step 7 to 8 is wrong, because i = sqrt(-1), as established in step 6, that gives i^2 = {sqrt(-1)}^2, which is undefined, because the sqrt-function is only defined on non-negative integers.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches