>>2213679>I still think that voting no because you're upset that people are pushing the yes vote hard and occasionally going to far is spiteful, impulsive and immature.I agree, I'm voting no 90% based on the evidence we've seen on the effect it has on nations and cultures.
>Telegraph>Borderline tabloid source, and my phone reply window is covering the link.Borderline tabloid? Seems a mite convinient to throw out opinions you deem as tabloid. I don't like the media as much as the next bloke, but come on. In this article a man car bombed the Christian Lobby. thje police were like "Not politically motivated" Him: "Um, yes it was"
>Channel 10 shopped a bus>Both sides do dumb shit like this, we live in a clickbait era.Bit more than clickbait mate, you can't just declare it to be so, it's outright lying to the public to slander the other side
>The woman firing someone over their no vote>Aware of that story, it was less about the no vote and more about being a sensitive environment and said worker not shutting up about it when asked, IIRCSo she was fired because she shared her opinion in a 'sensitive' environment? Seems a bit extreme, and perhaps even a cop out.
With the bloke copping death threats, it's wrong for the bloke to threaten him, but we only saw one example. If we took it seriously if some spastic autismo on the internet threatened to kill us we'd be in a perpetual state of fear.
>Death Threat(s)People vote for a number of reasons, however the insanity of the yes camp has pushed many people who were on the fence to a no. Whether this is right or wrong is beside the point, it'd be the same if the no side was actively firing people, had massive mainstream media, business etc support and called all the yes voters bigots.
When you continually call those who disagree bigots, eventually they gonna get fed up with it.
I wish it didn't come to this though
