>>22180514Since 1945, we’ve been told that nuclear weapons could end the world in a single flash. But what if they never existed? What if they were nothing more than a carefully crafted psychological weapon, designed to control nations and populations through fear?
H.G. Wells first wrote about atomic bombs in 1914—decades before they “existed.” How convenient that reality followed fiction so perfectly. Look at the footage of nuclear tests: they all look like the same low-budget 1950s sci-fi film, conveniently recorded on grainy cameras, never captured with modern technology.
Now, Hiroshima and Nagasaki—why do their destruction patterns match firebombed cities like Tokyo and Dresden instead of the “instant vaporization” we’re told about? The Japanese surrendered after the Soviets invaded Manchuria, not because of the bomb. And why has no country ever won a war using nukes? The US didn’t use them in Korea, Vietnam, or Iraq. The Soviets never used them in Afghanistan. Why?
The answer is simple: they aren’t real. They exist in propaganda, in newsreels, in cartoons where comically oversized bombs drop with a whistle. They keep us in fear, justify endless military budgets, and distract from actual advanced weapons—perhaps energy-based, frequency manipulation, or something far beyond our understanding.
If nukes were real, we’d have seen them used by now. But they remain a myth, a shadow, a Cold War boogeyman. The only real weapon is fear itself.
