>>22244548none of those things define the essence of the person, their instincts, or their instantiation of patterns of collective psychosocial behaviour, emergent from the shared genetics of their racial group
culture is downstream from genetics, after all, and all of the things you described are sociocultural, and have nothing necessarily to do with genetic expression beyond that initial genetic-cultural causative link
you're talking about jobs and fetishes and hobbies, as though those things define the intrinsic self and nature of a person—they do not
they're expressions of it at best
look at hormonal profiles, neuronal density and cranial capacity, bone strength, disease tolerance, genetic propensity towards delayed gratification and planning, executive function, self-regulation, ability to conceptualise and abstract
yes, there might be individuals who buck the trend of their group, but they're the exceptions who prove the rule
for some reason, you're talking about specifics; generalities are general, and race is a generality
you're arguing against the notion that racial groups can be understood in terms of their collective characteristics
but the collection of characteristics is exactly what delineates a given racial group from others
