>>22248889be pretty sure of whatever you want
you have a glaring mental fault, in that you derive a sense of self-worth from an identity you've constructed on /bant/
look, here's you deriving:
>>22248851this tells me about the type of person you are, i.e. you have narcissistic tendencies and are reliant on ego self-inflation as a defence mechanism
this is a typically Cluster B trait, and also tells me your IRL life isn't going so well, or you wouldn't be reliant on such maladaptive coping strategies in the first place
I think that logic checks out
if your IRL life isn't going so well, and you have to construct a digital 'Cheers' bar Where Everybody Knows Your Trip in your mind, to be somebody and define yourself by this, then you're likely not in any kind of real life relationship to define yourself by that, which is why you're searching for validation and companionship and a sense of identity online
the fact you lack IRL companionship tells me this glaring fault in your defective personality is yet more apparent IRL, and possibly that your genomic expression hasn't produced favourable results, i.e. I'd wager you unattractive both inside and out
in summary, at best, you're a withdrawn social pariah with an inflated sense of self
the perfect candidate to partake in the "incestuous wankfest of defectives" of my critique
>"i'm the one they tried to boot out but couldn't"am I supposed to be impressed by that, or what? I'm nonplussed
I can't help but find it incredibly small
fire off insults all you like, it's impotent
