>>22270874And get retaliatory strikes.
i mean there are were a couple of certain people at your helm that did bank on that option, but they lost last year.
And while the 50s is not achievable, 80 or 90 depending on situation is possible with some concentrated work of a decade or so.
You do need to drag the rest of your de facto vassal states out of excessive beurocracy kicking and screaming.
Because the people who would like a more American spirit take on the economy, well they are a minority almost everywhere. Europe in particular.
Just look at the last protests the Belgians had. Their prime minister said that ok enough with unlimited unemployment aid, and a few basic cuts to financing de facto laziness and they had one of the largest union protests in recent times. When the argument was the very sensible dude no more money FFS.
Shit that even commie Latin Americans actually understand FFS.
Manage to do that and a lot of the burdens on lack of manpower and funding for global security issues less shouldered just by you. Just don't let them federalize since exits going to be pretty much the same francogerman beraurats in charge.
Argentina especially is a good case study and propaganda piece that will resonate especially in east Europe as we had a similar story 30 years ago and we dragged it out for almost a decade instead of 2 years.
Partly you are already doing it with outrageous demands that then are accepted to just US ownership of the trade routes around your continent be it in the arctic or the Panama.
Because you can be the main beneficiary of the global trade empire by just billing people on the provided security indirectly.
And native strategic manufacturing is now again in fashion. So there is a way to get both the coast Landers, as well as the US heartland era to cooperate on that plus to give some table scraps to the lazy euros once whipped in shape.
The Asian allies as well but their situation is different. Way more of the woman problem
