>>22307917The Grimnismal lays out the structure. After telling us about the first five heavenly holds, two stanzes serve as a break which is seen in other classical description of astrological houses (eg Babylonian system of 5+7). Then we hear about the other seven holds who correspond to the traditional seven Germanic winter months.
Our twenty-four sacred runes correspond to those divine pairings (eg Donar & Sif).
>How so?>numismatic evidence Yes, certainly there was/were a dynasty of Karls, but what exactly happened there is anybody's guess. People did not care that much and at some point judeo-christians realised they could simply make up shit (eg Constantine's conversion) or rewrite.
But details matter, which is why they retconned them but also the reason we cannot verify some of the most important details. Moreover, the closer you look, the worse it gets. Charlemagne's twiseted architecture is what brought me to revisionism. I can't unsee what I've learnt because it's clear that centuries have been falsely inserted or misattributed while historians overfocus on what are clearly propaganda writings.
To make it short: fall of Rome, then centuries of nothing, then Karl builds basically a roman pleasure palace with Roman tech, Roman material, Roman engineering, then everything dissappears and those resurrected engineers, tech and materials vanish again into obscurity. Worse, European history has to deliberately shine the spotlight on one location after the other and pretend nothing really happened in the meantime, Scandinavians forgot how to build ports for centuries etc.
This is as ridiculous as the holocaust.
With Alexander, clearly some important details have been twisted as well. Of course there was hellenism, but when exactly and how? The story itself is beauftiful but probably less as realistic as the literal interpretation of the Odyssey.
Shame I have to bounce now. Take care of your kin and stay true to HOLY EVROPA.
Sieg Heil, mein friend.
