[70 / 29 / ?]
Quoted By: >>22359299 >>22359300 >>22359301 >>22359302 >>22359305 >>22359306 >>22359311 >>22359313 >>22359317 >>22359321 >>22359327 >>22359329 >>22359330 >>22359333 >>22359336 >>22359351 >>22359353 >>22359354 >>22359357 >>22359360 >>22359364
Following the discovery of tubes under the pyramids i asked grok some questions.
https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1903553093507420414
so basically if they just transmit sound from the earth's vibrations they only make on average a few GJs a year.. meh
This could power a small household (10–20 MWh/year) for a fraction of the year, assuming energy storage.
but if there is a geothermal reservoir underground..
it could amplify energy production to 110 TJ/year (realistic, 10% uptime) or 1.1 PJ/year (ideal, continuous), compared to 1–10 GJ/year from seismic alone. This yields:
Practical: ~30 GWh/year (110 TJ = 30,556 MWh), enough for ~1500–3000 homes annually,
Maximum: ~300 GWh/year (1.1 PJ), powering a small city.
So now the question is, wireless energy or not?
https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1903553093507420414
so basically if they just transmit sound from the earth's vibrations they only make on average a few GJs a year.. meh
This could power a small household (10–20 MWh/year) for a fraction of the year, assuming energy storage.
but if there is a geothermal reservoir underground..
it could amplify energy production to 110 TJ/year (realistic, 10% uptime) or 1.1 PJ/year (ideal, continuous), compared to 1–10 GJ/year from seismic alone. This yields:
Practical: ~30 GWh/year (110 TJ = 30,556 MWh), enough for ~1500–3000 homes annually,
Maximum: ~300 GWh/year (1.1 PJ), powering a small city.
So now the question is, wireless energy or not?
